2025: Imperial College London — Ulcerative Colitis Key Inflammatory Molecules Adsorbed by Enterosgel®

2025: Imperial College London — Ulcerative Colitis Key Inflammatory Molecules Adsorbed by Enterosgel®

Imperial College London · Falk Foundation / Guts UK Medical Student Prize 2025 · BSG Annual Meeting, Glasgow · UEG Week 2025

Award-Winning Imperial College Study Confirms Enterosgel® Adsorbs Key Inflammatory Molecules Implicated in Ulcerative Colitis

Symriti Kaur-Paneser  ·  Dr Luke Hanna  ·  Professor Nick Powell  ·  Mr Emma V Carrington  ·  Imperial College London  ·  2025

Study details

Proof of concept in vitro study of the adsorption capacity of Enterosgel for cytokines and enzymes relevant to Ulcerative Colitis.

Kaur-Paneser S, Hanna L, Powell N, Carrington EV. Imperial College London, Translational Colorectal Research Laboratory, Department of Surgery and Cancer; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Department of Colorectal Surgery. Presented at The Pelvic Floor Society Annual Meeting and UEG Week 2025 (abstract PP0529). Winner of the Falk Foundation / Guts UK Medical Student Prize 2025, announced at the British Society of Gastroenterology Annual Meeting, Glasgow, June 2025.

98.7% IL-1β adsorbed within 15 minutes
99.4% MMP-9 adsorbed within 15 minutes
95.8% TNF-α adsorbed within 15 minutes
78 samples analysed including charcoal controls via ELISA

The award

Recognised at the highest level of UK gastroenterology research

In June 2025, Symriti Kaur-Paneser was awarded the Falk Foundation / Guts UK Medical Student Prize 2025 at the British Society of Gastroenterology Annual Meeting in Glasgow — one of the most prestigious awards in UK gastroenterology for early career researchers. The prize, presented annually in partnership between the Falk Foundation and Guts UK charity, recognises outstanding research personally undertaken by medical students on intercalated degree programmes. A £1,500 prize was awarded for her study investigating Enterosgel®’s adsorption of key inflammatory molecules implicated in Ulcerative Colitis.

“Winning the Dr Falk Guts award is an incredible honour and a powerful affirmation of my aspiration to pursue a career in academic medicine. The opportunity to explore the field of IBD and faecal urgency has deepened my passion for translational gastroenterology. This recognition is not only a source of immense pride but also a strong motivation to continue contributing to research that directly improves patient care.”

Symriti Kaur-Paneser — Falk Foundation / Guts UK Medical Student Prize Winner 2025

The study was subsequently presented as a poster abstract (PP0529) at UEG Week 2025 — the largest European gastroenterology congress — and at The Pelvic Floor Society Annual Meeting, bringing the findings to an international clinical audience.


The problem

Faecal urgency in UC: a Top 10 research priority with no good treatment

Ulcerative Colitis (UC) affects approximately 300,000 people in the UK. One of the most debilitating symptoms is faecal urgency — the sudden, uncontrollable need to reach a toilet immediately. Crucially, this symptom affects up to 50% of UC patients even when the disease is in remission and there is no active inflammation. This means that half of all people living with UC continue to experience a profoundly life-limiting symptom even when their treatment is technically working.

The James Lind Alliance — which identifies research priorities through consensus between patients, carers, and clinicians — has listed treatments for faecal urgency as one of the Top 10 research priorities for IBD. The current first-line option, loperamide, is used cautiously due to the risk of constipation and is not suitable for long-term use. Advanced therapies such as biologics and JAK inhibitors address inflammation but offer limited relief from functional bowel symptoms. There is a clear unmet need.

The clinical gap

Up to 50% of UC patients experience faecal urgency even in remission

Loperamide carries constipation risk and is unsuitable for long-term use

Biologics and JAK inhibitors offer limited symptomatic relief for functional symptoms

Faecal urgency treatment is a James Lind Alliance Top 10 IBD research priority


The hypothesis

Could Enterosgel® selectively bind the inflammatory molecules driving UC symptoms?

Enterosgel® is already established as a clinically effective treatment for IBS with diarrhoea (IBS-D) — demonstrated in the RELIEVE IBS-D randomised controlled trial published in GUT journal in 2022. But IBS-D and UC share some overlapping mechanisms, and the question Symriti Kaur-Paneser set out to answer was whether Enterosgel®, by adsorbing key inflammatory molecules in the gut, might offer similar benefit in the UC context.

The study tested Enterosgel®’s ability to adsorb three specific molecules that are directly implicated in UC pathogenesis and symptom activity: IL-1β (interleukin-1 beta), TNF-α (tumour necrosis factor alpha), and MMP-9 (matrix metalloproteinase 9). These molecules are large — and Enterosgel®’s selectivity increases with molecular weight, making them theoretically good targets for adsorption.

Why molecular weight matters for Enterosgel® selectivity

Enterosgel®’s adsorption affinity increases with molecular weight — it preferentially binds large harmful molecules while leaving small-molecule drugs largely intact. The molecules tested in this study are orders of magnitude larger than water and fall within the range Enterosgel® is expected to bind most effectively.

Water 18 Da — not adsorbed
IL-1β 17,500 Da — tested & confirmed adsorbed
TNF-α 51,000 Da — tested & confirmed adsorbed
MMP-9 92,000 Da — tested & confirmed adsorbed
C. diff Toxin A (reference) 308,000 Da — confirmed adsorbed (prior study)

Study design

How the study was conducted

The study was a laboratory-based in vitro proof of concept, conducted at Imperial College London’s Translational Colorectal Research Laboratory. Recombinant versions of the three target molecules were diluted in Enterosgel® and incubated under a range of systematically varied conditions to establish the adsorption kinetics and capacity of Enterosgel® for each molecule.

Experimental conditions tested

Incubation time

15 to 120 minutes — to establish adsorption kinetics and determine how rapidly binding occurs

Analyte concentration

0 to 3,000 pg/mL — to test performance across a range of inflammatory loads including severe disease states

Gel concentration

0.056 to 0.225 g/mL — to test whether higher doses of Enterosgel® improve adsorption capacity

Controls

All conditions run with negative control (blank) and positive control (activated charcoal). 78 samples total underwent ELISA analysis.


Results

What the study found

The results were striking. Enterosgel® demonstrated rapid, concentration-dependent adsorption of all three inflammatory mediators, with the majority of binding occurring within the first 15 minutes of exposure.

IL-1β

98.7%

adsorbed within 15 minutes

Residual as low as 0.25% at higher gel concentrations

MMP-9

99.4%

adsorbed within 15 minutes

Residual as low as 0.28% at higher gel concentrations

TNF-α

95.8%

adsorbed within 15 minutes

Saturation observed at 1,000 pg/mL — relevant under severe inflammation

A key practical finding was the dose-response relationship: doubling the gel concentration decreased residual inflammatory mediators by approximately 30%, suggesting that dose adjustment could be clinically meaningful. The adsorption plateaued by 120 minutes, consistent with the physiological transit time in the upper gastrointestinal tract.

TNF-α showed saturation at 1,000 pg/mL — an important nuance, suggesting that under conditions of very severe inflammation, Enterosgel®’s capacity to bind TNF-α may be exceeded. This is a clinically relevant observation that informs future study design and dosing strategies.

Compared to activated charcoal — a non-selective adsorbent that cannot safely be taken alongside medications — Enterosgel® showed consistently lower residual analyte levels in individual experiments, though this difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.14), which the authors note is expected in a proof-of-concept study at this scale.


Drug interaction safety

Does Enterosgel® interfere with UC medications?

The study also addressed a clinically critical secondary question: could Enterosgel® inadvertently adsorb the medications that UC patients depend on — including biologics and JAK inhibitors? This is the essential safety question that must be answered before any oral adsorbent can be considered as a complementary therapy in this patient group.

As Kaur-Paneser noted in her award citation: “Its potential to adsorb essential UC treatments, including biologics and JAK inhibitors, must also be carefully evaluated to ensure it does not interfere with their efficacy. Understanding and evaluating the interactions between Enterosgel and essential UC treatments will be crucial in determining the clinical utility of Enterosgel in UC management.” This secondary aim forms part of the ongoing research programme.

The previously published Nature Scientific Reports adsorption study (Howell, Mikhalovsky, Khovanov, 2019) demonstrated that Enterosgel® adsorbs at least ten times less of commonly prescribed small-molecule drugs than activated charcoal — a finding that supports its use alongside medications with a two-hour gap between doses. Whether this selectivity extends to the large biological molecules used in UC treatment is an important question for further study.


What this means

The prospect for patients with IBD

This study is important for several reasons. It is the first published proof-of-concept evidence that Enterosgel® can adsorb the specific inflammatory molecules that drive UC symptoms — providing, for the first time, a mechanistic rationale for investigating its use in IBD beyond IBS-D.

For patients living with UC, faecal urgency is one of the most functionally disabling aspects of the disease — affecting work, relationships, travel, and quality of life, often independently of disease activity. The prospect of a drug-free, non-absorbed, well-tolerated oral adsorbent that could address this symptom without interacting with existing treatments would represent a meaningful advance in UC management.

The authors are clear that this is a proof-of-concept study requiring further biological validation and clinical investigation. But the results provide the mechanistic foundation that justifies those next steps.

Future research directions identified by the study authors

Biological validation in cell-based and ex vivo models of UC
Assessment of adsorption of biologics (anti-TNF, vedolizumab) and JAK inhibitors to confirm drug safety
Dose optimisation studies to establish clinically relevant dosing for UC patients
Clinical trials investigating Enterosgel® as a complementary therapy for faecal urgency in UC remission

Read the full Enterosgel® clinical evidence

The RELIEVE IBS-D trial, NHS Drug Tariff listing, Lancet recommendation, and full research library at enteromed.co.uk/research

View the research →
Note: This study is a proof-of-concept in vitro investigation. The findings require biological validation and clinical study before conclusions can be drawn about the clinical efficacy of Enterosgel® in Ulcerative Colitis. Enterosgel® is a CE Class IIa registered medical device currently indicated for acute diarrhoea and diarrhoea associated with IBS-D. It is not currently indicated for the treatment of Ulcerative Colitis or IBD.

References

  1. Kaur-Paneser S, Hanna L, Powell N, Carrington EV. Proof of concept in vitro study of the adsorption capacity of Enterosgel for cytokines and enzymes relevant to Ulcerative Colitis. Abstract PP0529, UEG Week 2025; The Pelvic Floor Society Annual Meeting 2025. Winner, Falk Foundation / Guts UK Medical Student Prize 2025.
  2. Howell CA et al. Double-blinded randomised placebo controlled trial of enterosgel for the treatment of IBS with diarrhoea (IBS-D). Gut 2022;71:2430–2438. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327293
  3. Howell CA, Mikhalovsky SV, Khovanov AV. Investigation of the adsorption capacity of the enterosorbent Enterosgel for a range of bacterial toxins, bile acids and pharmaceutical drugs. Scientific Reports (Nature Portfolio) 2019. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-42176-z
  4. Black CJ, Ford AC. Personalisation of therapy in irritable bowel syndrome. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024;9:1162–76.
  5. James Lind Alliance. Top 10 priorities for IBD research. jla.nihr.ac.uk/top-10-priorities
  6. Guts UK / Falk Foundation Medical Student Prize 2025. gutscharity.org.uk/research/investing-future-researchers/gut/symriti-kaur-paneser/

Share this article

Facebook LinkedIn X / Twitter WhatsApp Email
Back to blog

Leave a comment